
Is it Dangerous for the
Bariatric Surgical Patient to Conceive?
Cynthia Buffington, Ph.D.
Beyond Change, January 2004
Recently, several of our bariatric
patients were asked to be guests on a talk show to discuss their personal
experiences with gastric bypass surgery (which the host incorrectly referred to
as ‘stomach stapling’). As often happens, the host had preconceived
notions concerning the risks of obesity surgery. One statement the host made
was that it was his understanding a woman should not become pregnant after
having bariatric surgery because it is extremely dangerous to do so.
Is this statement true? Should a
woman who has had a bariatric surgical procedure avoid becoming pregnant? Does
bariatric surgery increase the incidence of maternal complications or have
adverse effects on the health and well-being of the child? What are the
maternal/fetal risks of the morbidly obese before, as compared to after, weight
loss surgery?
Studies have found that obesity -
even mild obesity – substantially increases the risk for maternal complications
and poor pregnancy outcomes (see references 1-6 below). The obese as
compared to the normal weight female has a much higher risk during pregnancy of
developing gestational diabetes, pre-eclampsia, and genital and urinary tract
infections. The obese female also has an increased risk for blood clots and
pulmonary emboli (blood clots that break loose from the veins and lodge in
major vessels of the lungs with serious and, sometimes, deadly consequences).
Labor abnormalities and
post-delivery hemorrhage are more common with obesity, as is the need for
cesarean delivery. Furthermore, during and following cesarean section, the
obese woman is more likely to develop complications. Studies have reported that
obesity lengthens surgical time, is associated with greater blood loss, a
higher risk for developing blood clots or pulmonary emboli, and a greater
incidence of post-surgical infection.
In addition to maternal
complications, obesity also adversely affects pregnancy outcome. Maternal
obesity increases the risk for miscarriage, stillbirths, pre-term deliveries,
and neural tube defects. And, obese women are more likely to have large infants
who, according to studies, will be at increased risk for subsequent childhood
obesity and its deleterious health consequences.
Are obesity-associated
maternal/fetal complications improved with weight loss surgery? Do bariatric
procedures cause surgery-specific complications that can endanger the health or
well-being of mother or child?
Most studies have found that
neither the mother nor child are unduly endangered by pregnancy following
bariatric surgery (5-9, 13, 15-16). In fact, studies that have examined
complication rates of pregnancies of morbidly obese patients before and after
bariatric surgery have found significant reductions in maternal risks
(5-7) – significant reductions in rates of gestational diabetes,
pre-eclampsia, infections, blood clots, and other complications. Pregnancy
outcomes are also substantially improved with bariatric surgery – more
pregnancies are carried full-term, most delivers are vaginal instead of
cesarean, and the incidence of large infants is substantially lowered.
If studies have found that
bariatric surgery is highly beneficial in reducing pregnancy risks, where does
the notion come from that pregnancy after bariatric surgery is dangerous?
An earlier surgery, the
jejunoileal bypass, was associated with low birth weight infants and metabolic
problems (10). Such problems occurred because of the severe vitamin and mineral
deficiencies that this particular procedure caused. The jejunoileal bypass,
however, has since been abandoned and replaced by far safer and more effective
surgeries, including the gastric bypass, the duodenal switch, the adjustable
gastric band and vertical banded gastroplasty.
A few isolated cases of nutrient
deficiencies occurring with pregnancy following these surgical procedures have
been reported (11-14). Maternal iron deficiency anemia requiring
additional iron therapy has been reported following gastric bypass, without
harm to the infant (11). An increased risk for neural tube defects, presumably
due to a folate deficiency, has also been reported with gastric bypass (12-13).
And, in another case, a 10-month old male infant who was exclusively breastfed
developed a vitamin B12 deficiency from the mother who unknowingly had a B12
deficit (14).
The anatomy of the gastric bypass
procedure is such that an individual has an increased risk of developing iron,
vitamin B12, folate, and possibly other vitamin deficits. However, the risk of
such nutrient deficits is resolved or substantially reduced if the bariatric
patient adheres to the daily post-operative vitamin and mineral supplement
regimen recommended by their surgeon and nutritional staff before pregnancy and
if they continue to follow this regimen during pregnancy IN ADDITION to taking
prenatal vitamins.
The greatest risk for nutrient
deficits following gastric bypass or any other bariatric procedure occurs
during the rapid weight loss period when calorie intake is low (6,13). Because
of the high risk for nutrient deficits during this period, it is strongly
RECOMMENDED that an individual NOT BECOME PREGNANT for at least one year after
surgery. The concerns are: 1) the baby will be unhealthy in this relatively
semi-starvation state, 2) the mother will suffer nutrient deficits from the
additional nutrients her body will require to support the developing fetus, and
3) early pregnancy will reduce the long-term weight loss success of the
surgery.
Although it is certainly NOT
advisable for a bariatric patient to become pregnant during the first
postoperative year, there are studies showing that gastric bypass patients, as
well as individuals having had gastric restrictive surgeries (the adjustable
band), who conceived during the first postoperative year gave birth to infants
that were as healthy as those who conceived later (15-16). Nonetheless, to
become pregnant within the first postoperative year is not advisable and can
increase the risk for maternal and fetal nutrient deficiencies and associated
adverse health consequences.
Was the talk show host correct in
stating that ‘it is dangerous for women who have had baritaric surgery to
become pregnant’. Absolutely not!
Pregnancy complications and fetal
risks are significantly and dramatically reduced in women who have had weight
loss surgery. There are a few isolated case reports of nutrient deficiencies
adversely affecting maternal health or fetal well-being. However, the risk for
nutrient deficits during pregnancy are low if the bariatric patient: 1) avoids
becoming pregnant during the first postoperative year, 2) adheres to their
daily bariatric vitamin and mineral supplement regimen before, during and
following pregnancy, 3) takes, in addition to their regular vitamins and
minerals, the prenatal vitamins prescribed by their obstetrician, and 4) eats
healthfully and does not attempt to diet or lose weight during the gestational
period (6, 13).
For more information regarding
nutrient management during pregnancy for bariatric patients, see the article by
the bariatric nutritionist, Sally Myers, entitled ‘Pregnancy after Roux-en-Y
Gastric Bypass’ in the November 2003 issue of
Beyond Change.
References:
-
Lu GC et al. Am J Obstet Gynecol
2001; 185:845-9.
-
Sebire NJ, et al. Int J Obes Relat
Metabol 2110; 25:1175-82.
-
Norman RJ and AM Clark. Reprod
Fertil Dev 1998; 10:55-63.
-
Baeten JM et al. Am J Public Health
2001;91:436-40.
-
Deitel M et al. J Am Coll Nutr
1988; 7:147-53.
-
Wittgrove AC, et al. Obes Surg;
1998; 8:461-4.
-
Richards DS et al. J Reprod Med
1987; 32:172-6.
-
Bilenka B et al. Acta Obstet Gynecol
Scand 1995; 74:42-4.
-
Printen KJ and D
Scott. Am Surg 1982; 48:363-5.
-
Knudsen LB and B Kallen. Acta
Obstet Gynecol Scand 1986; 65:831-4.
-
Gurewitsch ED et al. Obstet Gynecol
1996; 88:658-61.
-
Martin L et al. Lancet 1988;
1:640-1.
-
Deitel M. Obes Surg 1998;
8:465
-
Grange DK and JL Finlay. Pediatr
Hematol Oncol 1994; 11:311-8.
-
Rand CS, Macgregor AM. S Med J
1989; 82:1319-20.
-
Martin LF et al. Obstet
Gynecol 2000; 95:927-30.
|